Comments on: Surreal paintings of Vladimir Kush

By: Otter

Otter — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:41:02 +0000

nicely worded cole. while i personally disagree, to most artists, being an amateur as a Senior in High School myself, criticism is sometimes appreciated, but those who simply tear apart the art because they do not feel that aesthetics are necessary nor even like that style of art (cubism, surrealism, photo realism, etc.) at all are quite irritating, and if one is going to criticize then giving suggestions on how to improve are almost always appreciated.

i myself believe his works are amazing. i cannot think of many ways in which he can improve. his ability to paint an emotion as a poet would write about one is awe inspiring. i hope to someday be as good as him.

By: Terri LaClaire

Terri LaClaire — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:19:25 +0000

I love the surreal work of Vladimir. My son found this site and shared with me. Being a lover of Dali whose work we had the privilage of enjoying in St Petersburg FL, he felt I would enjoy this work as well. My favorites are “Bound for Distant Shores” and Firery Dance. I would like to know where I can get prints of both.

By: Jovan Nikolic

Jovan Nikolic — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:46:29 +0000

Fantastic pieces. One of the best Surrealism paintings I ever saw.

By: cole

cole — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:03:06 +0000

I have to agree with Tyson and Sheebs. Besides for a few aspects of these, they’re not very creative. I painted in the style of Maxfield Parish for a while, and after fighting the criticism for a while, I finally realized that my critics were right. It’s just not as impressive when you use someone else’s established style without adding your own touch. Great technique, though. Just too Dali-esque. Oh yeah, and for those of you who are up in arms against negative feedback, some artists actually appreciate it. Just because you think it’s amazing doesn’t mean that other people can’t have different opinions about it.

By: Hannah

Hannah — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:04:01 +0000

Hi, i love Vladimir’s work they’re beautiful. But i’m always wondering. . . what does he use? Does anybody know? I look on the internet and it doesn’t tell me. I’m very curious because they look like watercolor rather than oil, or acryllic. If anyone could tell me i’d be very greatful.

By: Metaman

Metaman — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:41:12 +0000

You should see them animated! It is now available in a new DVD created by Vladimir Kush called Metaphorical Voyage. Check it out on metaphoricalvoyage.com

By: Letty

Letty — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:31:27 +0000

Happy to say that I’m a new owner of two of his paintings and 1 sketch. Fell in love with his work while visiting his gallery in Las Vegas Nevada. Fell in love with one of his paintings and had to have it, then wait…fell in love with one more and had to have that one too. Then couldn’t leave the sketch behind! Looking forward to seeing them hanging in my home, they’ll be arriving in a few weeks!

By: mandra

mandra — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 03:40:47 +0000

Wow… it really amazes me that some people can’t look at a thing of beauty and accept it as such, without degrading it by casting it as inferior… Vladimir Kush can add one more new fan today!

By: francisonline

francisonline — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:24:34 +0000

now that’s what i call talent.

By: Dreams

Dreams — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:18:48 +0000

Pretty amazing. The level of detail in Vladimir’s art work speak volumes.